Is Darwinism humanism masquerading as Science?

It was from that point he started to assemble a non-theistic worldview. We see in even Darwin, that it was not evidence from creation that he amassed his theory, but from the lack of belief, humanism. What made Darwin so famous in the humanist world is the fact that for the first time humanism could be justified via a materialist worldview.

Knowing this, it is important for Christians to fight from an apologetic stance not of religion versus science but of origins science versus empirical science.

There is nothing in the science of origins, that is testable, repeatable, falsifiable, or even observable. All of these things are demanded by empirical science. It is from the stance that Christians must lead the fight in creating a wedge between these two types of philosophies, I hate to call them sciences.

I don't think there is a Christian on earth that has any problem with empirical science, or quantitative science, or categorical science.

And so many great academics have said before evolution is really nothing more than free philosophical thought, as you've said quite poignantly masquerading as science, by drowning out the philosophy that supports it with scientific jargon.

Take a look at this quote:

This is from: The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

It is unlikely that
such a nebula would be created with no angular momentum, so it is
probably initially spinning slowly. Because of conservation of angular
momentum, the cloud spins faster as it contracts.

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/solarsys/nebular.html

Here's
a quote from one of our wonderful modern colleges. Explaining the
origins of the universe. It is unbelievable to me that sentences that
are seen above pass as credible. Notice in the first sentence that the only reason that nebular gas cloud has angular momentum, spin, is because it is unlikely for it not to have spin.
This kind of buffoonery is simply unacceptable as collegiate level
teaching material. Next time some one asks you for what caused God ask them what caused spin?

But it gets worse look at this.

Evidence for the Nebular Hypothesis

Because of the original angular momentum and subsequent evolution of the collapsing nebula, this hypothesis provides a natural explanation for some basic facts about the Solar System: the orbits planets lie nearly in a plane with the sun at the center (let's neglect the slight eccentricity of the orbits to simplify the discussion), the planets all revolve in the same direction, and the planets mostly in the same direction with rotation axes nearly perpindicular to the orbital plane. The nebular hypothesis explains many of the basic features of the Solar System, but we still do not understand fully how all the details are accounted for by this hypothesis. As we discuss in the nextwe now have some direct observational evidence in support of the nebular hypothesis.

They try to use the unified angular momentum theory to justify a nebular gas cloud theory, they state because all of the planets orbiting in the same direction and mostly rotating in the same direction and they lie in the same plane as a sign therefore this is evidence of a nebular gas cloud theory.

However

What they so quietly fail to mention, is that the following is true: that all of the planets or orbiting the sun in the same direction, however, this sun is rotating in the opposite direction of all the planets! the sun contains 98% of the mass in the solar system but only 2% of the angular momentum, the planets have 2% of the mass and 98% of the angular momentum according to astrophysicist this is exactly opposite of what is expected to happen if the nebula gas cloud theory were to be true.

This single example is a great proof of a falsification, according to Dr. Karl Poppers demands of scientific proof yet, our collegiate Institutes's throw all that in the trash can to pursue their big bang materialistic hypothesis. this is simply outrageous from any type of logical position.

I'd better stop now as I'm getting on a roll.

Let me finish with this, that in truth what we have is a scientific defense for the religion of humanism, no other theory in science is as bizarre and undependable as is  evolution.  There are no mathematical equations from which we can test the theory of evolution, as we can series such as gravity.  It is a preposterous heresy that has far too long plagued the minds of Christians as reasonable.

Thank you so much for your questions George.

your friend

Michael Fowler